Tuesday, September 20, 2016

The Tweeting Trump

Social Media has changed the way we do a lot of things in America. It has changed the way we communicate, interact, teach, learn, bully, and view certain things in our society. Social media has changed some of these for the good, and some for the bad. With the world at the touch of a button, we can connect with each other and learn so much faster than we could before. But on the flip side, social media has caused us as a society to lose the face to face connections and cyberbullying has become a problem in the more recent years. One area social media has really influenced is the 2016 Presidential Campaign. The primary republican candidate, Donald Trump, has completely transformed this election with his use of Twitter. But is this transformation of social media being used in a presidential campaign a good thing or a bad thing? Trump supporters would probably argue it's a good thing, and  Clinton supporters would probably argue it's a bad thing. Whatever side of the electoral spectrum you are on, Trump's Tweets have had a huge impact in this race. 

Trump's campaign has been anything but ordinary and his Twitter feed follows this theme. Every presidential candidate has a way to market themselves, and Trump uses Twitter. Trump floods his followers feed with thousands of tweets with controversial content. Specifically, 17% of Trump's tweets are about policy, 16% are about Republican candidates, 11% are about polls, 11% are attacking the media, 7% are about the Democratic candidates, and 3% are attacking women. (Fivethirtyeight). However, it't not the subject that makes Trump so controversial, it's the way he says things. Trump has no filter and says what he thinks and then his staff comes in and does damage control. This is why people hate him, but this is also why people love him, Besides being called racist, sexist, and a horrible tyrant, Trump is also called trustworthy because of his transparency. Especially with the scandals revolving around Hillary Clinton's "lies", Trump is made to seem like the what you see is what you get candidate. 

Is Trump's transparency a public relations tactic to help his campaign? Or has he always been this transparent? And does Trump being  transparent make up for his obvious theatrical and inappropriate hate speech? Either way, his Twitter tactics are working for him because his loud presence got him the primary republican candidacy. The Tweeting Trump has changed the way this country will run presidential campaigns for the years to come.  
   

Tuesday, September 13, 2016

Credibility of Wikipedia

The following three blogs all discuss the credibility of Wikipedia. All agree that Wikipedia can be more credible than we give it credit for, However, I made some of my own conclusions as well. 

http://damndanny.blogspot.com/2016/09/lets-talk-about-wikipedia.html#comment-form

http://mmjohnson341.blogspot.com/

http://kdcomm339blog.blogspot.com/



Wikipedia has this very by the people, for the people attitude. Anyone can go on Wikipedia and make edits or changes to a page. However, those changes are not published until they go through review. There are people that literally just sit and filter through Wikipedia edits to check the reliability. If something unreliable does get on a particular page, people can flag it. It makes people feel like that have a part of something, when in fact they really don't; kind of like our voting system. So in some cases, like looking up facts on Justin Bieber, or random definitions, yes, Wikipedia is a reliable source. For looking up information on Perelman's arguments on rhetoric, Wikipedia is probably not the place to go. But if you had no clue who Perelman was or what rhetoric is, then Wikipedia is a good place to go to get some basic information. Wikipedia is like the stepping stone to other sources.I do not think Wikipedia should be used as a reliable source for developing arguments in essays and debates. But using Wikipedia to understand the basics before getting into the more complex information is where Wikipedia is a credible source.

Monday, September 5, 2016

Social Media Gifting

We structure our culture on gift economics. The notion of a gift is given and received without the expectation of something in return. But is this really the case? Gift exchange is an just that, and exchange. Christmas, and other gift giving holidays. if we give someone a gift, we expect to receive a gift back. Even if we considered buying something at the store a gift exchange, there is still an expectation of when you give something, you receive something back. There is an underlying self interest behind gifting.

Social media and blogging fall into this gifting culture. Some people consider their blogs and social media posts to be their gift to the world. However, they don't just post things for no reason. People write blogs, tweet and post on Facebook and Instagram so the world can see what they have to say, or what they are doing. Social media and blogging are means for people to interact with each other and build connections. There is this  unwritten rule regarding social media that if a post interests you in any way, you like that particular post or share it on your own social media platforms. The underlying self interest behind social media is that the poster wants people to interact with their content. Marcel Mauss argues in The Gift that,"Almost always such services have taken the form of the gift, the present generously given even when, in the gesture accompanying the transaction, there is only a polite fiction, formalism, and social deceit, and when really there is obligation and economic self-interest. Although we shall indicate in detail all the various principles that have imposed this appearance on a necessary form of exchange, namely, the division of labour in society itself ."

Whether it is the teenage girl on Instagram who wants the likes for popularity, the business who wants to advertise their products and services, the blogger who wants to inspire others, or the student who is being forced to write this blog for an assignment, social media posts are put out there for the world to see. If social media is our gift to the world, then in gift economics, we have a self interest to receive something back. The teenager on Instagram wants the likes of her peers to validate the fact that her selfie was in fact totally awesome. The business who advertises their products and services wants your money. The blogger who writes to inspire people wants you to share that blog so more people can read their ideas. And the student who is forced to write this blog, just wants an A in the class. The point is, there is an underlying self interest behind social media posts.

For example, Justin Bieber who was discovered on YouTube, did not just post videos of him singing on the internet for no reason. He posted them in the hopes that his gift to the world would be discovered and he could become famous. Now is whether or not Justin Bieber's music is actually a gift to the world is arguable. However, he used this notion of gifting on social media to his advantage because now he is famous and  making millions.

Is social media gifting and this blog going to make me millions? Probably not. But for right now I'll just settle for my A in the class.